Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:40:58 +0200 > David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Having to specify a particular snippet makes sure that this snippet >> (and thus the construct) indeed appears in the docs, and that its >> absence will be noticed when compiling the documentation. > > You misunderstand. @lilypondfile will still be used for that.
As far as I understood, it is used for explicit quoting, not for cross-referencing. Anyway, I suppose I've stated my case. Others are more familiar with the structure and work on the documentation, so I'll accept their verdict on that. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
