On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Checks the need for an accidental and a 'restore' accidental
>> against a"
>> + " key signature. The laziness is the number of bars for
>> which reminder"
>> + " accidentals are used (ie. if laziness is zero, we only
>> cancel accidentals"
>> + " in the same bar; if laziness is three, we cancel
>> accidentals up to three"
>> + " bars after they first appear. Octaveness is either
>> 'same-octave or"
>> + " 'any-octave and it specifies whether accidentals should
>> be canceled in"
>> + " different octaves.")
>>
>> isn't this supposed to be texi ?
>
> I'm not sure what this means...
the doc strings are in texinfo format, with @var{foo} for variable
names, @code{'symbol} etc.
>> + (if (number? (car entry))
>> + #f
>> + (caddr entry)))
>>
>> I think you can write (and CONDITION VALUE) - or in this case (and
>> (not cond) value)
>
> Is it ok if I leave this as-is? Maybe it's because I'm not really a
> schemer, but I find this much clearer.
We can always postpone it, but in general shorter code is preferable.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
