>> Very nice! What do you think about making `dash-definition' either
>> accept a list of four parameters or a list of lists (with four
>> parameters each)? Then we could write
>>
>> #'(a b c d)
>>
>> and are not forced to use
>>
>> #'((a b c d))
>>
>> if the slur is not split into different segments.
>
> If the slur is not split into different segments, a will be 0 and b
> will be 1. So this proposal is still more complex than necessary.
Indeed. So it could accept either two numbers or a list of quartuple
lists.
> What about just defining a function
>
> \setSlurDash dash-fraction dash-period
>
> that would create the appropriate entry for dash-definition? We
> would also have \setPhrasingSlurDash.
This is fine with me.
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
