2009/4/17 Carl D. Sorensen <[email protected]>: > Does anybody *want* constant-thickness slurs or ties? I thought that > variable thickness was clearly better. I think that keeping inferior output > to avoid conversion problems is not a good decision. I'd rather force the > user to make a simple manual change and get the benefit of the improved > layout. It better presents the quality of LilyPond. If we allow inferior > layout to hang around, it will be something that people can use to impugn > LilyPond.
I prefer variable thickness myself (so long as I remember to avoid evince ;), but there's bound to be some user down the line who'll want the option of constant thickness only to be told it's impossible. Regards, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
