Op donderdag 05-11-2009 om 17:27 uur [tijdzone +0000], schreef Graham Percival: > On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Trevor Daniels <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Mats Bengtsson wrote Thursday, November 05, 2009 12:59 PM
> Sure, sounds reasonable. If anybody feels like looking into this, go > ahead. If not, please add it to the tracker, because I won't remember > it in 2 weeks or whenever I might start looking into it myself. Looked a bit into this and pushed a tighter test and a fix. What I do not understand is why/how timemodule.c built before. Greetings, Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter Avatar®: http://AvatarAcademy.nl | http://lilypond.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
