On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 10:36:41PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Op donderdag 05-11-2009 om 17:27 uur [tijdzone +0000], schreef Graham > Percival: > > Sure, sounds reasonable. If anybody feels like looking into this, go > > ahead. If not, please add it to the tracker, because I won't remember > > it in 2 weeks or whenever I might start looking into it myself. > > Looked a bit into this and pushed a tighter test and a fix. > What I do not understand is why/how timemodule.c built before.
Awesome! I'll make a test 2.13.8 tomorrow... I want to test some new regtest-handling code anyway. But I'll wait at least until Monday before making an official release. Jan, since you know both python and GUB, could you try making the lilypond scripts on darwin (convert-ly, lilypond-book, etc) point to the python that we distribute with lilypond, rather than #!/usr/bin/env? I think that might fix http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=894 Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
