Le lundi 09 novembre 2009 à 20:08 +0000, Graham Percival a écrit : > doing: > $filename = lc($filename) > works fine in the general lilypond-init.pl file.
In wich line or function exactly? The changes I proposed in a previous email don't work for me, even not for manuals. In case it matters, I use texi2thml 1.82, shoiuld I upgrade to CVS? > It probably won't work in the web init file, since > &lilypond_element_file_name is commented out due to some bug in > Opera. We also don't need that function since we call it with > --split=section and not --split=unnumbered. > Yes, it would be nice if that file was cleaned up so that > developers wouldn't get misled like this... I added it to the > tracker; it's somewhere around issue #850. > > *shrug* that's the cost of not doing preventative maintenance. *sigh* If I understand correctly, the map file for General is currently generated for nuts. Even if I understand you're busy with many other tasks, I find this, what you just pointed out and more generally the code duplication between the two init files quite a maoing mess, which is normal for stuff being developed but difficult to handle for people other than the one who did it. > (we might want to use lc(filename) for the regular manuals, as > well. Sure, this would simplify cross-references between the web site and other Texinfo docs. > And we could try looking into why we get the duplicate > anchors which confuse opera) Isn't it because Texi2HTML generates one anchor from the node, and another one from the section? Best, John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
