Le jeudi 12 novembre 2009 à 18:09 +0000, Graham Percival a écrit : > Lines 360, 381, 384. Documentation/lilypond-texi2html.init > Works for contributor; I didn't bother checking the others. From > a clean source tree.
Ah, thanks, my too limited understanding of the init file made me downcase only in texinfo_file_name when returning the filename, which is not enough. > > If I understand correctly, the map file for General is currently > > I think you mean "init file"? No, the map files are in out-www/xref-maps. I don't know how you got the low-case filenames working without knowing this :-) > You're reluctant to do lilypond stuff because of phd issues? I'm > spending about half my waking hours working on lilypond -- and I'm > already an official phd student. Maybe, but AFAIK you're not setting a joint supervision between two bureaucratic countries, the most bureaucratic one being maybe France :-P > (should we start casting dirty looks at Reinhold and Patrick? > They were the people who wrote the original one, so they're in the > best position to remove the unneeded code from the new one... but > again, I don't believe in blaming / making demands on people > because they helped out in the past) It will take me dozens of hours to understand Texi2thml init scripts well and then a few extra hours to do the planned changes/bugfixe/cleanups. I'm not making any demand, I'm just complaining about the time and effort I will have to spend for this. Anyway, I don't understand well this diatribe here: I never suspected you of casting any dirty look when you were complaining about the build system complicatedness (or whatever the maoing correct term in English is). > > > And we could try looking into why we get the duplicate > > > anchors which confuse opera) > > > > Isn't it because Texi2HTML generates one anchor from the node, and > > another one from the section? > > Great! You know more than me. Want to take it over? Probably. I think I identified the problem, but it will takes me a couple of hours to get deep enough into the init file to be able to solve this. > I'm sorry, I didn't want to snap at you. Don't be afraid of this, we have many ongoing LilyPond tasks that would been enough even if we worked full time on it, I wrote my previous message under pressure before going to Paris. > But I think everybody > has seriously underestimated both the amount, and importance, of > these basic "maintenance" tasks. This is well said. Best, John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
