Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Seems like you're way ahead of me on this. I'm happy
> to accept whatever you think best.
>
> "Programmed smart" sounds good, and your (1) and (3)
> sound do-able, but the others sound pretty hard to me
> (i.e. I wouldn't know where to begin.)
I'd like to just de-quantize accent and espressivo for now
because the "smart" stuff is also beyond me. Perhaps I
should submit an issue to the tracker? Anyway, I presume
everyone here should be okay with the attached patch, but
I'm running it by you guys first, just to be safe.
- Mark
From 2da62be5119fbf894c8e786015d3eca7647305e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Polesky <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 01:50:19 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] script.scm: Quantize staccatissimo; de-quantize accent, espressivo.
---
scm/script.scm | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scm/script.scm b/scm/script.scm
index 652bbd6..15f0be4 100644
--- a/scm/script.scm
+++ b/scm/script.scm
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@
. (
(avoid-slur . around)
(padding . 0.20)
- (quantize-position . #t)
(script-stencil . (feta . ("sforzato" . "sforzato")))
(side-relative-direction . ,DOWN)))
("accentus"
@@ -83,7 +82,6 @@
. (
(avoid-slur . around)
(padding . 0.20)
- (quantize-position . #t)
(script-stencil . (feta . ("espr" . "espr")))
(side-relative-direction . ,DOWN)))
@@ -259,6 +257,7 @@
("staccatissimo"
. (
(avoid-slur . inside)
+ (quantize-position . #t)
(script-stencil . (feta . ("dstaccatissimo" . "ustaccatissimo")))
(padding . 0.20)
(side-relative-direction . ,DOWN)))
--
1.6.3.3
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
