On 01/07/2010 10:37 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Op donderdag 07-01-2010 om 09:02 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave > Plater: > > >> Sorry at the beginning of this mail I said I suspected ghostscript, this >> is what I get in the failed build after the first mention of "Processing >> `./3f/lily-65a7b1b1.ly'" :- >> `gs -dNOSAFER -dEPSCrop -dCompatibilityLevel=1.4 -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH >> -r1200 -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile="./3f/lily-65a7b1b1-1.pdf" -c >> .setpdfwrite -f "./3f/lily-65a7b1b1-1.eps"' failed (11) >> > Right. This is the command I filed a bug report for and asked you to > check a few days ago, see > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-01/msg00147.html > > Glad to learn it fails for you too. Hopefully this helps the > ghostscript maintainers to update a bit more quickly and frequently :-) > > Greetings, > Jan. > > This is where it starts to go wrong but there are many successful gs commands and only the one that fails. I'm now using the opensuse "build" command which osc is based on to troubleshoot and I'm trying build without the "# norootforbuild" header in the spec file and using "# needsrootforbuild" where, if I understand the man page, the build is done as root as apposed to user abuild which is used with osc and the build service, to find out why this command fails with build service and doesn't fail with rpmbuild run as root. When you compile from sources, you normally do so as user so if I'm right then a normal build from sources as user would fail, if lilypond didn't take so long to compile the doc section I would have already tried this. Under what circumstances do you get the same failure? If you're interested in gs-1.70, I've installed the fc10 src rpm with zypper and have renamed xorg-x11-libXt-devel to libXt-devel built in home:plater:branches:X11:XOrg and renamed libjasper-devel to jasper-devel to make this possible. Oh well the above mentioned attempt to build with build just failed in exactly the same place, so either it's a missing package or something that differs in the environment. I've inserted a "gs -h" before the first make command in the hope of finding something there. What is the exact meaning of "failed (11)"? I'll check out your link but if the above failed command succeeds when I compile with rpmbuild it's got to be something that differs between the two builds. Thanks Dave P
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
