On 01/07/2010 12:06 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Op donderdag 07-01-2010 om 11:39 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave > Plater: > > >> This is where it starts to go wrong but there are many successful gs >> commands and only the one that fails. >> > That's what you call a bug, right? > > >> If you're interested in gs-1.70, I've installed the fc10 src rpm with >> zypper >> > Thanks, but no, not really. It just needs to be updated in factory. > > >> What is the >> exact meaning of "failed (11)"? >> > It means segmentation fault, a serious problem with ghostscript. That's > why I reported it. > > >> I'll check out your link but if the >> above failed command succeeds when I compile with rpmbuild it's got to >> be something that differs between the two builds. >> > Yes -- it may be that the segfault is triggered by a missing file or > a different environment setting. That would make for an easy > workaround. Still, gs should print a warning and exit if that is so. > And most likely, an update to 8.70 fixes it without even having to > look into this. > > Greetings, > Jan. > > > It could also be some sort of corruption in the input layout file that causes it but is handled gracefully by gs-8.70. I also have the other error :- programming error: FT_Get_Glyph_Name () error: invalid argument which occurs quite frequently in the failed build but not at all in the successful one. Regards Dave P
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
