Reinhold Kainhofer <[email protected]> writes: > Am Mittwoch, 28. April 2010 20:15:00 schrieb David Kastrup: >> But I don't like its look. Would you consider c4/8 an adequate syntax? > > Unfortunately, it's already in use. How would you distinguish the two > currently possible syntaxes: > > c2*3/8 > c2*3:8
The latter makes only limited sense: what does it mean to do an eighth tremolo on a half note that is three times as long as written? Make the latter c2/8*3, and it makes more sense. But I agree that this distinction is a bit fine for comfort. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
