On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Carl Sorensen <[email protected]> wrote:
> But I think we could use ; in LilyPond, even though it's used for comments
> in Scheme, because the ; inside a scheme function aren't interpreted by the
> LilyPond parser, IIUC.
I like ';' very much (mostly because it feels familiar when you're
used to ':' ).
Speaking of which, I often wished we had a cool shortcut for writing
repeats using a postfix syntax, e.g.
{ large music expression here };4
instead of
\repeat unfold 4 { large music expression }
Yes I know: a) that's off-topic b) this will wait until GLISS starts.
-- As should this whole discussion IMO: may I take this as an
opportunity to remind you guys that there's a whole new ML for stuff
like that? http://lists.lilynet.net/syntax/
Cheers,
Valentin
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
