> So how about the ultimate tweak: using a separate engraver? We
> can't have overlapping slurs with a single engraver, for example.
> But if we write something like
>
> <c( e...@1( g> <d...@1) f)>
>
> and use @1 with the scope of a tweak, and let it use the engraver of
> subvoice 1 (a subvoice having its own engraver copies that get to
> handle basic events just from its own subvoice), then it becomes
> possible to use parallel slurs in one voice.
I like this. Up to now noone had ever such an idea, and your
suggestion sounds very promising. If you say that it is feasible to
implement, the better! BTW, are there any possible disadvantages
besides adding a new operator like `@' and the foreseeable MusicXML
difficulties?
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
