On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So how about the ultimate tweak: using a separate engraver? We >> can't have overlapping slurs with a single engraver, for example. >> But if we write something like >> >> <c( e...@1( g> <d...@1) f)> >> >> and use @1 with the scope of a tweak, and let it use the engraver of >> subvoice 1 (a subvoice having its own engraver copies that get to >> handle basic events just from its own subvoice), then it becomes >> possible to use parallel slurs in one voice. > > I like this. Up to now noone had ever such an idea, and your
This is false. I had the idea earlier and unleashed it on the world. It was called the Thread context, and it was a disaster, because it would die or be created at unexpected times. I you dive deep enough into the git history, you can find its remnants. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [email protected] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
