On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 5:13 AM, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: > Wilbert Berendsen <[email protected]> writes: > > > Op donderdag 30 september 2010 schreef David: > > > >> With the current code, a score that used to take 5 pages now takes 8, > >> really really spaced out. > >> > >> I don't see that we can release a version of Lilypond that takes up > >> horrifically more space than the previous not-skyline-based code. > >> > >> Making use of the skyline instead of the bounding box should never lead > >> to results taking more space. > > > > Strange, in my experience the spacing (esp vertically) is tighter and > less > > pages are used most times. (An engraving of all Goudimel psalms takes 141 > > pages in 2.13.10 and only 131 in 2.13.35.) May be something else is going > on > > in your score? A long time ago I had very strange horizontal spacing > problems > > (with large gaps) that went away when I used --disable-optimising at the > > ./configure command line. > > > > best regards, > > Wilbert Berendsen > > Don't get me wrong. Something like > > \score { c } > \score { c } > \score { c } > \score { c } > \score { c } > \score { c } > \score { c } > \score { c } > \score { c } > \score { c } > \score { c } > \score { c } > \score { c } > \score { c } > \score { c } > \score { c } > \score { c } > \score { c } > \score { c } > \score { c } > \score { c } > > is indeed squeezed onto a single page even though it does not fit at all > (it does not appear like any numbers of these scores will ever be put on > two pages). >
How long has this been a problem? It comes from page breaks being forbidden all the way from the frontend, and I don't think that has been touched for a while...
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
