David Kastrup <[email protected]> writes:
> David Kastrup <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> I have to disagree with your assessment: the behavior of 12.3 made sense
>> under the constraints the code worked with. It was a result of its
>> design decisions. The result of 13.35 does not make sense. As you can
>> easily see by removing the markup, it is not a result of a generally
>> wider spacing decision.
>>
>> If you think different, how about the following:
>
> [...]
>
> It is particularly educational to look at the distances used in the last
> page. They don't particularly look like the general spacing is intended
> to be on the loose side.
Here a shorter recipe:
\score { \repeat unfold 480 { c'^\markup { \column { x y z } } } }
Again, compare the last page with the other pages.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
