On 11/5/10 7:49 AM, "Graham Percival" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 07:36:42AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote: >> I don't think it's worth delaying 2.14 in order to debate either of these >> questions. Can't we just note that the debate exists, perhaps add it to our >> list of GLISS topics, and move on to getting 2.14 out? > > It's not a GLISS (syntax) topic; it's a GOP (general organization) > topic. And it's already noted: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-10/msg00404.html > http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/policy.html > > The formalizing of hackers is, appropriately enough, topic > 3. Hackers A > Great! Let's move on, OK? If Valentin wants to patch the documentation, then he can propose a patch. The same applies to anyone else who wants to propose a patch. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
