reverting is OK since the patch is wrong ad Valentin asks for it, right? Let me think about that. What I would like is for Valentin to fix it the way he thinks it's best. Eg: two patches, one simple git revert --no-edit and the new patch. I don't like reverting other people's patches.
Graham Percival schreef op di 07-12-2010 om 12:09 [+0000]: > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Valentin Villenave > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Here's a new patch that you can use instead of the previous one. > > (Since you've reverted it.) Please let me know how that works! > > Jan, where are we on this? > - do you want to officially git revert Valentin's previous patch, then > apply this one instead? > - do you want to ask Valentin to create a patch from current git head? > > I'd like to make another unstable release in the next day or two (when > 1427 is fixed), so it would be nice if this could be sorted out. I > don't know what the original patch was doing, so I'm not eager to jump > in and examine the new one. > > Cheers, > - Graham > -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
