My comments on the two discussion points below.
http://codereview.appspot.com/3743045/diff/1/Documentation/notation/expressive.itely File Documentation/notation/expressive.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/3743045/diff/1/Documentation/notation/expressive.itely#newcode366 Documentation/notation/expressive.itely:366: Textual crescendo marks begin with @code{\cresc} I have to agree with Keith here - the manual will be more helpful if we simply say what terminates a text crescendo rather than expecting the reader to work it out. A reference manual should be a source of accurate and complete information that can be retrieved easily and quickly, not a puzzle that has to be worked out and which still leaves the reader wondering if anything else might be a termination. Trevor http://codereview.appspot.com/3743045/diff/1/Documentation/notation/expressive.itely#newcode392 Documentation/notation/expressive.itely:392: Textual marks can also be produced by @code{\<} and @code{\>}: I don't object to saying "deprecated". http://codereview.appspot.com/3743045/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
