Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> writes: >> In this particular case it may not matter, but the >> >> while ((flip(&d) != UP) >> >> is a common idiom in the lilypond source code > > Chiming in on that; I think that we prefer these > patterns or idioms over specialisations.
In this particular case, it declares a loop variable, some variables inside and various other stuff, in order to save one call. And I have the suspicion that sorting one group reversely might solve the bug we are seeing here, anyway... > Also, if you find a nice way of making the idiom nicer, > change it all over the source tree in one go. Well, I showed one example using break. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
