On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 09:49:11PM +0000, Neil Puttock wrote: > On 13 January 2011 18:56, Graham Percival <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Are there any other know regressions that aren't on the tracker? > > There's the memory problem reported here, > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-01/msg00184.html
I thought that was a problem related to the mensural patch? Regardless, I don't think that we should hold back a stable release for memory issues, unless we're using hugely more memory than previous versions (more than would be expect from the improved page breaking algorithms and other new features). I don't think that we've ever claimed to have a low memory footprint. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
