thanks, updated.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4438054/diff/2002/Documentation/notation/input.itely File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/4438054/diff/2002/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode2373 Documentation/notation/input.itely:2373: you have multiple unnamed staffs, the events for all staffs will On 2011/04/19 16:06:48, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Didn't we agree to use staves as the plural? I can't remember.
I specifically thought of that discussion, but I mis-remembered the result. Thanks, fixed. http://codereview.appspot.com/4438054/diff/2002/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode2402 Documentation/notation/input.itely:2402: @qq{proof of concept}. If it does not cover some event(s) that On 2011/04/19 16:06:48, Trevor Daniels wrote:
If some events that you want to see are not included, ...
Thanks, fixed.
[I guess using 2nd person here is clearer.]
I thought so. Plus, we relax the rules for @knownissues anyway -- I know that the doc policy says not to use "you", but I didn't see the point in spending minutes thinking of ways to rewrite a sentence in the @knownissues. http://codereview.appspot.com/4438054/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
