On 13 July 2011 20:51, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> Was I too narrow in my original fix? I can work on something cleaner to > address the segfault that doesn't lead to cyclical dependencies so that this > doesn't perturb future generations of regtests. That would be great. BTW, like James, I've also occasionally had changes in graphical output (the length of the beams over rests). Cheers, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
