On 13 July 2011 21:03, Neil Puttock <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 13 July 2011 20:51, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Was I too narrow in my original fix? I can work on something cleaner to
>> address the segfault that doesn't lead to cyclical dependencies so that this
>> doesn't perturb future generations of regtests.
>
> That would be great.
One other thing: the regression test is too complicated; AFAICT, the
original crash was caused by a beamed skip combined with a rest, so it
could be condensed to a single beat:
\new Voice << { r4 } { s8[ s] } >>
Cheers,
Neil
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
