Hello, )-----Original Message----- )From: [email protected] )[mailto:[email protected]] On )Behalf Of [email protected] )Sent: 24 July 2011 09:41 )To: [email protected]; [email protected]; )[email protected]; [email protected]; lilypond- )[email protected]; [email protected] )Subject: Re: Produces better error messages when programmers forget )to document a property. (issue4801045) ) )On Jul 24, 2011, at 12:05 AM, [email protected] wrote: ) )> Can you give me an idea what his does and how to test this or what I )> am going to see as someone who runs a lot of make/reg tests? )> ) )Try adding an undocumented property to an interface (i.e. add "foo" to )the Stem interface) and then run make. Before, make would throw an )error about procedure-name when building internals.texi. Now, it will still )throw that error, but before that, it'll explicitly mention that "foo" is )undocumented, allowing for one to then document it. ) )Cheers, )MS
Thanks, for this information. I'll try to run the test tonight - I ran out of time yesterday - so I can see what it looks like when it does what it is supposed to do, using Neil's 'broken' patch. James _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
