On 2011/07/25 11:18:28, James.Lowe_datacore.com wrote:
Hello,
)-----Original Message----- )From: mailto:[email protected] )[mailto:[email protected]] On )Behalf Of mailto:[email protected] )Sent: 24 July 2011 09:41 )To: [email protected]; [email protected]; )[email protected]; [email protected]; lilypond- )[email protected]; mailto:[email protected] )Subject: Re: Produces better error messages when programmers forget )to document a property. (issue4801045) ) )On Jul 24, 2011, at 12:05 AM, mailto:[email protected] wrote: ) )> Can you give me an idea what his does and how to test this or what
I
)> am going to see as someone who runs a lot of make/reg tests? )> ) )Try adding an undocumented property to an interface (i.e. add "foo"
to
)the Stem interface) and then run make. Before, make would throw an )error about procedure-name when building internals.texi. Now, it
will still
)throw that error, but before that, it'll explicitly mention that
"foo" is
)undocumented, allowing for one to then document it. ) )Cheers, )MS
Thanks, for this information. I'll try to run the test tonight - I ran
out of
time yesterday - so I can see what it looks like when it does what it
is
supposed to do, using Neil's 'broken' patch.
James
Pushed as 922d59a242646c2488738d77263580427bd7764b. Cheers, MS http://codereview.appspot.com/4801045/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
