Hey Mike, 2011/8/27 <[email protected]>: > http://codereview.appspot.com/4636081/diff/42001/scm/define-grobs.scm#newcode1944 > scm/define-grobs.scm:1944: (X-extent . ,ly:stem-tremolo::width) > On 2011/08/23 07:48:39, MikeSol wrote: >> >> For consistency's sake (I just went through this with flags), keep this >> as a style property and document the possible values in the Stem_tremolo >> docstring in stem-tremolo.cc (the part with ADD_INTERFACE). > > I'm not sure if i understand. Do you say that i should rename shape to > style?
I'm not sure whether i should push this patch or not. Can you explain what is your concern? cheers, Janek http://codereview.appspot.com/4636081/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
