Carl Sorensen <[email protected]> writes: > New-odd-rhythm is odd as well (and it should be, because the rhythm is > odd -- with this type of syncopation the quaver should be broken up > into a hemidemisemiquaver (did I get this right) tied to a > double-dotted semiquaver, which would have a tie at the quaver > boundary.
New-odd-rhythm does not make sense: it has 5/16 to the beam on the "second" beat. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
