On 11/5/11 8:27 PM, "David Kastrup" <[email protected]> wrote: >Carl Sorensen <[email protected]> writes: > >> New-odd-rhythm is odd as well (and it should be, because the rhythm is >> odd -- with this type of syncopation the quaver should be broken up >> into a hemidemisemiquaver (did I get this right) tied to a >> double-dotted semiquaver, which would have a tie at the quaver >> boundary. > >New-odd-rhythm does not make sense: it has 5/16 to the beam on the >"second" beat.
I agree. Is it any worse than Old-odd-rhythm, which has 7/64 to the beam on the "first" beat and 9/64 to the beam on the "second" beat? My inclination would be to not worry about this change in the regtests -- it goes from one bad to a different bad. Neither one is right. Instead, I'd fix the regtests so that they had sensible beaming, and demonstrate that it worked properly with sensible beaming. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
