Graham Percival <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 05:28:44PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: >> Graham Percival <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > Skimming through lily/GNUmakefile, this makes sense. There's a >> > couple of explicit dependencies for parser.hh, but these don't >> > mention lily-lexer-scheme.cc, which is the file that triggers the >> > fail. >> >> But the out/lily-lexer-scheme.dep file mentions it in the last line: >> ../flower/include/arithmetic-operator.hh include/pitch.hh out/parser.hh >> >> Does that mean that we generate the dependencies without actually using >> them? That sounds rather stupid, but then I don't understand the build >> system anyhow. > > ... yes? no? > Bottom line: somebody added explicit dependencies to > lily/GNUmakefile, for some reason. It could have been somebody > not really understanding the build system, but at least it worked. > > I wouldn't be surprised if Julien sent in a patch in a few > hours/days that removed the explicit dependencies for the parser > in favor of a more general solution. :)
He'll have to be pretty fast. I'm on it. But I am afraid you have to expect another hour or so before I get this fixed. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
