On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 07:19:55PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Graham Percival <[email protected]> writes: > > > No problem; I'm quite happy that Patchy is pulling his weight so > > soon. :) > > Never mind Patchy... After the problematic commit, you made a release > tag and everything. This is going to be one mess of a cleanup.
eh? release/unstable should be strictly ahead of master, in a completely different way than staging is strictly ahead of master. Isn't it possible to rebase staging on top of release/unstable? IIRC we might lose the updated VERSION string, but that's easy to fix. I'd like to keep the offifical 2.15.23, mainly for the regtest comparison (that's pretty much the only reason I make releases, after all!). I'm not concerned if we lose the release tag, or even the release announcement (I can re-create that too). Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
