http://codereview.appspot.com/5553056/diff/1/python/book_snippets.py File python/book_snippets.py (left):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5553056/diff/1/python/book_snippets.py#oldcode806 python/book_snippets.py:806: self.ext = os.path.splitext (os.path.basename (self.filename))[1] On 2012/01/22 00:08:45, Julien Rioux wrote:
The '.ly' is hardcoded elsewhere already, so that when you include a .ily, lilypond-book actually writes a lily-????.ly file for
it, and
this is what we link to. On the other hand leaving the current code in
leads to
broken links to a lily-????.ily file.
What about --use-source-file-names? http://codereview.appspot.com/5553056/diff/1/python/book_snippets.py File python/book_snippets.py (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5553056/diff/1/python/book_snippets.py#newcode124 python/book_snippets.py:124: line-width = #(- line-width (* mm %(padding_mm)f) (* mm 1))''', On 2012/01/22 00:08:45, Julien Rioux wrote:
On 2012/01/21 23:54:36, Reinhold wrote: > Aren't there cases when neither LINE_WIDTH nor QUOTE is used?
Yes, that's the case for html-inline-no-option.html
I was rather talking about e.g. when the papersize=... snippet option is used in a texi file... (I think that doesn't work currently, either, though).
> In that case we don't subtract the padding...
Why would a padding be relevant when there is no specified line width?
The line width is implicitly specified by the paper size. http://codereview.appspot.com/5553056/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
