On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 06:37:59PM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > Five rounds of guesswork from several developers for a single sentence > would not seem like the most efficient use of manpower for proceeding on > this item.
Agreed; just go ahead and push whatever you have right now. Regardless of whether it matches David's or my suggestion. But as a general note, I recommend to re-use existing news items as much as possible (i.e. copy&paste to announce the latest lilypond report, only changing numbers and links. Copy&paste release announcements, candidate rejections, etc. If you just copy what we currently do (or recently did), then there'll be less thinking and discussion about whether the new plan is good or not. Even more general tip about "cat herding" (i.e. open-source developer management): if something isn't worth discussing, then try to make sure that nobody has anything to discuss. Many lilypond policies are designed with that guideline. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
