On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Graham Percival <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 06:37:59PM +0000, [email protected] wrote: >> Five rounds of guesswork from several developers for a single sentence >> would not seem like the most efficient use of manpower for proceeding on >> this item. > > Agreed; just go ahead and push whatever you have right now. > Regardless of whether it matches David's or my suggestion. > > But as a general note, I recommend to re-use existing news items > as much as possible (i.e. copy&paste to announce the latest > lilypond report, only changing numbers and links. Copy&paste > release announcements, candidate rejections, etc. If you just > copy what we currently do (or recently did), then there'll be less > thinking and discussion about whether the new plan is good or not. > > Even more general tip about "cat herding" (i.e. open-source > developer management): if something isn't worth discussing, then > try to make sure that nobody has anything to discuss. Many > lilypond policies are designed with that guideline.
good point. pushed 4476f6dd7300bb84f6eac756ebcd8c3a1c96125c _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
