----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian Hulin" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055)
Hi Arnold,
On 18/07/12 09:16, ArnoldTheresius wrote:
David Kastrup wrote:
... Disagree. That sort of symbol should count as silent when
reading IMO, even if you might spell it out in phone dictation.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6398055/
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel
mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Just some quotes from notation.pdf ("old" version 2.15.37): "An
\autoBeamOff call in the first arbument of partcombine ..." "...
brace of the next in an \alternative block, otherwise ..." "...
occurring in an \adQuote command ..." "... custos with an \override
if desired, ..." "When an \augmentum dot appears ..." "... by
naming them on an \include statement." "... will insert an
\allowPageTurn at the final bar line ..."
Common practice seems to vote for 'silent' backslash, just as David
said.
Oh joy, another slice of inconsistency, I've got used to reading the
commands the other way mentally as the docs go to great lengths to
index then all under '\'.
Nice catch for arbument, David,
Cheers,
Ian
Not exactly:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=855
--
Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
