ian_hulin wrote:
>
> Hi Arnold,
> On 18/07/12 09:16, ArnoldTheresius wrote:
>>
>>
>> David Kastrup wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> ... Disagree. That sort of symbol should count as silent when
>>> reading IMO, even if you might spell it out in phone dictation.
>>>
>>> http://codereview.appspot.com/6398055/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel
>>> mailing list [email protected]
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
>>>
>>>
>> Just some quotes from notation.pdf ("old" version 2.15.37): "An
>> \autoBeamOff call in the first arbument of partcombine ..." "...
>> brace of the next in an \alternative block, otherwise ..." "...
>> occurring in an \adQuote command ..." "... custos with an \override
>> if desired, ..." "When an \augmentum dot appears ..." "... by
>> naming them on an \include statement." "... will insert an
>> \allowPageTurn at the final bar line ..."
>>
>> Common practice seems to vote for 'silent' backslash, just as David
>> said.
>>
> Oh joy, another slice of inconsistency, I've got used to reading the
> commands the other way mentally as the docs go to great lengths to
> index then all under '\'.
> Nice catch for arbument, David,
> Cheers,
> Ian
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
>
>
Sorry if I hit someone by 'flying too deep' with my fingers,
so I did hit the 'b' instead of the 'g' ... I'm used to type on
the keyboard with 'nine fingers' (usually not using the left
hand thumb) and often I don't look to the resulting text
exactly enough.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Volta-enhancements-tranche-1-%28issue-6398055%29-tp34175083p34179422.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
