On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Graham Percival <[email protected]> wrote: > At the Waltrop meeting, Janek proposed a number of interesting but > potentially disruptive changes to the lilypond syntax. On a > personal note, I really like most of them, [...]
I'm very happy to hear this :) > I'm not enthusiastic about cluttering -devel with preliminary > discussions like teaching me about music functions vs. whatever > the other thing are. At one point there was a mailing list on > lilynet for syntax discussions, but I'm not certain if that's > active. I could also make a new gnu.org mailing list... but > either of those options would require anybody interested in that > discussion to sign up for a new mailing list. I'm in. :) > Thoughts? opinions? alternatives that I haven't considered? > These discussions are going to produce a *lot* of emails. A chat might be more efficient for explaining things to other people, but it isn't archived and if it was, its difficult to search, i think. A separate mailing list seems to be a good fit. cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
