Janek Warchoł <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 3:15 PM, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: >> Graham Percival <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> At the Waltrop meeting, Janek proposed a number of interesting but >>> potentially disruptive changes to the lilypond syntax. On a >>> personal note, I really like most of them, but it will take a good >>> chunk of work before they're ready to discuss on the main >>> development list. >>> >>> Further complicating issues is that it quickly became apparent >>> that I am not personally qualified to judge if a proposal is ready >>> for main discussion. >> >> Wouldn't the purpose of a discussion be to present and discuss >> advantages and drawbacks? The question of _discussing_ a change is in >> my opinion quite different from _implementing_ a change. > > I suppose Graham meant that proposals presented for main discussion > should be well-shaped and free of big and/or obvious problems.
If there are big and/or obvious problems, the discussion would be short anyway. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
