Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanw...@gmail.com> writes: > it seems that we are still inventing our syntactically complex > programming language, which ironically is implemented on top of GUILE > Scheme.
There is no irony involved. Scheme's syntax is computer-friendly, LilyPond's syntax is user-friendly. If they did not serve complementary purposes, we would not need both. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
