Han-Wen Nienhuys <[email protected]> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 12:04 PM, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> You can also argue that people that know what a duration is, and how to
>> use it will be better served by writing Scheme directly. Because a
>> duration is complex enough in Scheme already.
>
> The whole idea of integrating pure Scheme expressions, ie. #(+1 2),
> into LilyPond was to avoid the complexity of having to invent another
> programming language.
Ah, but you did.
do = 1 - 3
\language "italiano" { do = 1 - 3 }
What does this do?
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
