On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:18 AM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >[..]
Thanks for saying all of this; I think it has been very well put. > I don't have a good answer here, and I am not particularly happy with > suggesting that the work I end up doing will not likely be shaped much > by committee or community decisions but rather mostly by my own > conscience and programmer instincts. Which, in turn, are shaped by the > perceived needs of the community. That may actually be a boon; despite best intentions, design by committee usually does not lead to good designs. > overall scheme, and also make some things easier to get done with. With > regard to _designing_ the language of LilyPond, I think we are better > off discussing and relating our goals, and seeing where this takes > development. +1 -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
