David Kastrup wrote Monday, September 03, 2012 2:44 PM
> "Trevor Daniels" <[email protected]> writes: > >> Graham Percival wrote Monday, September 03, 2012 1:00 PM >> >>> I don't know where to go from here. I spend a lot of effort >>> trying to organize such discussions, because I think that LilyPond >>> is a community project. I think that we should encourage people >>> to participate, but telling people "ok, thanks for your work on >>> XYZ, now get lost while the real developers talk about ABC" might >>> discourage people from working. >> >> It did. > > No doubt. And I don't want to promote a setup which will essentially > end up as exactly that when viewed honestly. [snip] > I am doing the best I can, but I don't really see how I can justly deny > the underlying gist of the characterization "ok, thanks for your work on > XYZ, now get lost while the real developers talk about ABC". And I want > to avoid creating organizational structures that will cause exactly that > impression if I am trying to do serious work according to the best of my > conscience. David, it wasn't anything /you/ said; it was Han-Wen's reply which dismissed my cautionary offering as "bed-shedding" and referring to a sneering video about other syntax failures. Which, incidentally, illustrated my real point (which he missed) ideally. You're doing fine! Trevor _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
