Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> writes: > Chord repetition is a *central* part of piano music (and not only > there). It really deserves a proper syntax, and I'm glad that we have > it now.
How come the pianists don't have it in the score then? >> Editing shortcuts have a nice place in editors. > > `q' is certainly more than an editing shortcut. > >> q is one of those features that make LilyPond unfeasible as a >> storage format for music. > > I believe exactly the opposite. Uh, _storage_ format. Not human-oriented shorthand. The kind of thing for which MusicXML is feasible. I don't see how a memorize-with-delay-only-proper-chords-in-original-relative-octave-and-strip-some-configurable-information type command like q would facilitate better storage, which is what your "exactly the opposite" would imply. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
