2012/9/4 David Kastrup <[email protected]>: > David Kastrup <[email protected]> writes: > >> Thomas Morley <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> That said, now some thoughts ontopic: >>> In most cases I'm quite fine with the current lily-syntax concerning >>> the pre/post-commands. >>> But there are cases I'd wish to be more consequent. >>> >>> Example: >>> <c-1\2\rightHandFinger #2 g> >>> Sometimes backslash, sometimes dash! >> >> Dash is required for single-character shorthands like -. -- -^ -_ -3 and >> similar. It is also required when a _music_ function returning an >> articulation follows (like \tweak ... -.). It is not required when an >> event function or a variable containing an articulation follows. You >> _can_ always add it. >> >>> Well, >>> <c-1\2-\rightHandFinger #2 g'>1 >>> works, too. >>> >>> But >>> <c-1-\2-\rightHandFinger #2 g'>1 >>> not. >> >> Why wouldn't it? [trying it out] Pfffffft. You are right. I consider >> this a bug worth fixing. > > Issue 2808 <URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2808> > > I expect this patch to go through uncontested. Should be even suitable > for 2.16.1.
Thanks. > > Any more zero-day blunders? Not yet. But let me think a while. ;) _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
