> The first is to define a "null" event which functions like the empty
> chord <>.
While this is perhaps a nice syntax sugar idea...
> \new Voice { c'1 y4\< y y\> y\! }
... I think that this is a nightmare both on the user and the
parser/lexer side. Your proposed `y' essentially means to go
backwards in time which is against all principles of LilyPond, as far
as I know.
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
