2012/10/9 David Kastrup <[email protected]>: > Benkő Pál <[email protected]> writes: > >> 2012/10/9 David Kastrup <[email protected]>: >>> I don't really think that people consider \times and \scaleDurations as >>> closely related (and their naming choice is also totally different), so >>> I don't think that there will be much of an opportunity confusing the >>> behavior of \scaleDurations with \tuplet. >> >> I, for one, consider \times a visually enhanced variant of \scaleDurations. >> regardless how it's written, to me both mean metric change (and metric >> is represented poorly in graphic anyway). > > Do you feel that the changed fraction gender of \tuplet would be a > potential source of confusion for you in the light of your view of > \scaleDurations?
definitely not, I'm fine with the \tuplet proposal, it mimics better the engraved representation. BTW do we still have \compressMusic or only \scaleDurations? p _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
