Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> writes: >> \accidentalStyle StaffGroup.voice > > This is my preferred form. However, some time ago we decided (more or > less) to say e.g. > > \clef "bass" > > In the light of your syntax improvements/simplifications, shouldn't we > start to use > > \clef bass > > instead, making data in double quotes really user strings only?
\clef bass_8 won't work, neither will \clef treble^8, and I see no sensible way to make them work. As long as that is our naming choice, using quotes for clefs is the only way to keep the syntax consistent. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
