On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:21 AM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Joe Neeman <joenee...@gmail.com> writes: > > > But now that we are giving a hook into push, I think that the > > non-pushing default of override will cause problems. > > I consider it utterly ludicrous that the mere availability of \temporary > will magically cause problems with the existing usage of \override, Is the example I posted (and which you snipped) utterly ludicrous? > but > there is no point in continuing this farce as I have already given up. > Do you really consider this discussion a farce? I thought I was making reasonable points, but if they are indeed farcical then perhaps I should give up too.
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
