David Kastrup <[email protected]> writes: >> I'll merge stable/2.16 into translation. That should be >> unproblematic. > > The only reaction to that was a mail from Francisco which did not much > to address this part of my plan. > > I did this right now, and afterwards discovered that there is a branch > translation-staging. It is obvious that I suffer from a case of having > not kept track of how translations are actually organized, so it may be > possible that someone would need to hand-advance translation-staging to > match translation, assuming that the organization of > translation/translation-staging is similar to master/staging with regard > to automatic testing. > > Ugh. Sorry for that. With the apparent lack of > replies/comments/interest (possibly due to the translation list just > downing any contribution from non-list-members), I felt I needed to move > ahead in _some_ manner.
Ok, it would appear that translation had been ahead translation-staging already before my merge, so it seems I should take no guesses here and just let people who actually know what translation-staging is for deal with it. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
